Page 1 of 1
is there an erratum to Volume 1 -16th Edition
Posted: Sun Jul 19, 2015 7:00 pm
by GSB
on page 290 L118 S.G.F18 Fiscals
No1 is listed as 1d pale reddish purple
No2 is listed as 3d dull purple
a mistake ?
Re: is there an erratum to Volume 1 -16th Edition
Posted: Sun Feb 28, 2016 11:53 am
by Tony
This may be apropos :
There are so many errors creeping into the Specialised Catalogues these days, not only of previously established facts but also typos and incorrect illustrations, that some time ago I wrote to SG suggesting they produce a catalogue of all the varieties and errors contained in their catalogues.
I am still awaiting a response . . . .
Tony
Re: is there an erratum to Volume 1 -16th Edition
Posted: Mon Feb 29, 2016 7:02 pm
by PhilW
The Mulready Yahoo group maintain a file of amendments. The last update I've seen was March 2015.
Re: is there an erratum to Volume 1 -16th Edition
Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2020 10:03 pm
by GSB
With regards to the catalogue entry, correct, this should be a 1d, it will be amended when we re-do this section of the catalogue. Reply from Stanley Gibbons